Good Stories

October 20, 2008

I am constantly amazed at the world I live in. Everywhere I turn it would there are unique and interesting narratives. Starting in November, The Good Fight Creative will be bringing you a diverse range of short documenatries, catagloging the “Good Stories” that happen to us and the communites we inhabit.

Be sure to sign up for our RSS feed so you know when our first Good Story is uploaded.

Subscribe to The Good Fight Creative by Email”>Click here to sign up.

by Community Photography, under Creative Commons Licence.

by Community Photography, under Creative Commons Licence.


 Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Book: Jeannette Walls’ The Glass Castle

October 20, 2008

I just finished reading Jeannette Walls’ The Glass Castle, which I thought was fabulous. While the writing wasn’t the most polished I’ve ever read, what gripped me most was the dual nature of her parents, who on one side infuriate you at their utter lack of accountability and parenting, and almost bring you to tears with their eccentric and cowboyish adventures. It’s a great read and one that inspired us here at The Good Fight. [Read more]

Open Source For Non-Profits

October 16, 2008

For the first seven years of my life I never had a baseball bat. In fact, nobody in the neighborhood had one. Simple reason was, we couldn’t afford one. Not about to let the kids in Jollyville, the rival neighborhood, get ahead, we put our heads together and came up with a solution. We broke off a few branches from a dead ocotillo cactus, placed a few large leafs over them and wrapped them together tightly together with fishing wire and, and voila, a functional bat. Not a Louisville slugger, but it got the job done. Over the course of one summer that was the bat that most of us learned how to hit with. Our ingenuity became the envy of the neighborhood. When I told my father about it, he smiled at said “well, the price was right.” In those tough economic times, the only price that was right was free. Sound familiar?

Over the next few years many small to mid-size non-profits and art centered project(s) will be facing severe financial cuts that, if not managed right, could lead to loss of revenue, exposure and messaging. Looking for ways to trim budgets while keeping the quality of organizations mission will be on the minds of most Executive Directors and boards. The natural tendency would be to scale back, downsize and “hunker” down. While this strategy may work for some aspects of business, I believe now is the time for smarter, more focused messaging, in particular, a new approach to an organization’s visual communication strategy. There has never been a better time to differentiate one’s organization or project from the crowd. New media technologies mean that you can spend less and do more if you are willing to consider a new approach.

The question is, however, how to do that in this chaotic economic environment. Having worked with non-profit and arts organizations for the last eight years I can testify that there is very rarely a shortage of ideas, but instead a shortage of resources available and allocated to make those ideas a reality. The question then becomes, are there alternative ways to achieve our visual communication goals without breaking the bank? While a conflux of unique circumstances has conspired to break our economy, another “perfect storm” has hit the digital creation marketplace, with much different results.

Let’s back up for a moment and take a look at some of the core ingredients that go into implementing an organizations visual communications strategy (note: at this point I am assuming the organization (or project) has already created an overall communications strategy). The focal point of most communications strategies is the web, as it serves as the main “hub” of your strategy, with all the other elements being the “spokes”, and they work together in concert to provide a cohesive and coordinated presentation to your targeted audience. Those elements would include your visual messaging (photography, graphic design), Multimedia presentations (podcasts, video, powerpoint) and print (brochures, annual reports). While there are many other elements that are often included, I think you’ll find them all sub-elements of the list above.

The budgetary requirements to implement a comprehensive plan with the the elements outlined above is out of reach for most small non-profits or arts organizations. The catch 22 is, if you don’t implement your strategic plan what good is it to have one, and if you implement your plan but it breaks the bank, how can you justify it. My solution for smaller organizations is to embrace Open Source.

What is Open Source? Wikipedia defines it as “a development methodology,which offers practical accessibility to a product’s source (goods and knowledge). Some consider open source as one of various possible design approaches, while others consider it a critical strategic element of their operations.” In addition, Open Source also includes “OSS”, or Open Source Software, which is “defined as computer software for which the human-readable source code is made available under a copyright license (or arrangement such as the public domain) that meets the Open Source Definition. This permits users to use, change, and improve the software, and to redistribute it in modified or unmodified form. It is very often developed in a public, collaborative manner. Open source software is the most prominent example of open source development and often compared to user generated content.” For the purposes of this discussion, we are going to focus on OSS, but framed under the overall banner of the “development methodology”, as I think this can be appropriated by organizations as well.

OSS can include everything from web design applications to complete Content Management systems. The software is free to use and modify, although there are often some fine print in terms of credit and distribution. Most of these programs are widely available on the internet and have a fair amount of documentation. The capabilities rival those from the commercial sector, and are often updated faster than their commercial counterparts because of the sheer size of the development pool and, because it’s users are it’s developers, there is an imbedded need for fast, real-time solutions.

The learning curve of these systems is fairly straightforward. Google and other information resources have made access to user-generated documentation and trouble shooting of most OSS software easy and accessible, which is one aspect that should reassure organizations considering going Open Source. One of it’s early shortcomings was the lack of customer support (and is one area where the commercial products still rule). But, in this age of shrinking financial resources, many organizations will have to rely on human-power to push agendas forward, so the thought of spending a few hours troubleshooting versus paying two-thousand a year for Customer Service Support doesn’t sound so daunting.

Some of the early challenges organizations that went Open Source encountered have diminished with its wide appeal. When OSS first arrived on the scene, many of the programs were inaccessible to those that were not coders or programers. Additionally, the functionality operated about two years behind commercial products, making them somewhat irrelevant for those trying to do innovative and cutting edge work.

In todays OSS environment, functionality is running about six months behind commercial software, and that gap is confined to only the most complex processes and functions. For the 90% of organizations there is relatively no difference between OSS and commercial software functionality.
Let’s examine one of the main leaders of Open Source software, and look at the practical implications for implementing your digital communciations strategy.

Wordpress

Wordpress is the largest self-hosted blogging tool in the world, used on hundreds of thousands of sites and seen by tens of millions of people every day. It started from a single piece of code and, thanks to the tens of thousands of developers who have contributed to it, has now grown into a (small) Content Management System that is more than capable for handling all of a small to mid-level organizations online needs.

Basically, Wordpress works as a template system. Okay, I can hear the groans already. Like you, I have a severe dislike of templates as they are generally boring, uncreative and lack the type of innovation that I like my projects to encompass. Wordpress’ template system is much different, however. I like to think of it as a “skeleton system”, providing the end user with a working prototype of their site within, say, 20 minutes, and allowing them to expand and build upon that skeleton to suite their own needs. Those with a PHP background can build their own templates from scratch, but I have found that there are more than enough base templates to allow for unlimited customization and creativity without having to build one from scratch.

The experience of setting up and using Wordpress is about as straight forward and easy as a web platform can get. First, purchase your domain and set up your hosting plan. I use Bluehost, and I have been very happy with their service. They also provide something called Fantasico, which is a great script that will install OSS programs on your server with the touch of a button. Using Fantasico, is similar to setting up an email account, will allow you to have a fully functional version of Wordpress installed and running on your site, all within about 15 minutes.

Wordpress’ core functionality includes creating “pages”, which are static pages that you don’t expect to change much, like the usual “about” pages on websites. Also, and this is where Wordpress really shines, allowing for dynamic blog posts, which you can display in infinite ways to your audience. Just about every other web function you can think of is handled by something called “plugins”. At last count, there are 3,124 plugins available at Wordpress’ home page, and many more scattered throughout the web. On the Good Fight’s website, I am using 22 plugin’s from 22 different authors. They enable such functionality as dynamic contact forms, event calendars, social bookmarking for my readers, and on and on. Plugins are so amazing that I often find myself perusing the Wordpress Codex for new and interesting plugins, whether for the Good Fight or for my personal blog. It’s a great way to keep fresh your audience’s experience at your site as well as improving functionality.

What really makes Wordpress stand out is the fact that it’s “server side”, meaning the core files and application reside on your server, as opposed to a host computer. By contrast, when a designer or developer creates a site in Dreamweaver, they are working locally (on their computer) and uploading/publishing those HTML files onto your server. While this may work well for the individual, it can play havoc with an organization who does not have a Dreamweaver or web developer in house. Furthermore, the maintenance of a site is ongoing, and many times in smaller organizations this falls to the hands of an office manager. Without the knowledge of coding,or how a particular developer created a site, s/he is basically unable to properly maintain and update a website. Commercial programs like Contribute do an adequete job of proving some of these tools, but in my exeperience they are far too limiting in their functionality to be truly useful. Try re-editing a blog post and changing the color of the link text in Contribute and you’ll see why.

In Wordpress, you can have unlimited numbers of users accessing the “guts” of the program, and you can assign levels of access to various users to “restrict” them from places on the site that are either private or risky for someone to be monkeying around in. For example, let’s say you want your administrative assistant to approve user comments made on your company’s blog post, and also update the sites “bio” page with a new staff member, and finally run a backup of the database should the server crash. In Wordpress the process is simple: s/he logs in, hits a manger tab, opens up the page, pastes in the new bio, and hits publish; next s/he hits the “comments” tab and hits “approve” or “disapprove” to moderate the comments, and finally, to backup the database s/he simply hits “manage” and then “backup”, and Wordpress starts an automated process. By contrast, should the same type of scenario play out with a traditional HTML site designed in Dreamweaver, it would be a much more complex and tedious process, and one fraught with more serious consequences should there be an error along the way.

Another element to the above situation is that these types of changes (and the thousands of other commands possible) can be implemented anywhere in the world where there is web access. You could, for example, have your communications director uploading a corporate report from home while one of your field executives posts a blog while at an airport. As I mentioned before, you can have as many users as you want, and each of those users can be given a “role”. It’s the ultimate way to manage your web site in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. Oh yeah, and it’s free.

From a design standpoint, many people feel “boxed” in by the template system. I know many developers who think their creativity is “stiffled” by working within the framework of a Content Management System. While it does take some with CSS and PHP knowledge to properly customize a template, there are some great out of the box templates that costs less than a dinner for four at Outback steak house. And because of the extensive documentation at Wordpress, and the easy to navigate interface, a design savy person can learn the basics of template customization within a few weeks.

For extensive layout customization, however, I would recommend hiring a Wordpress designer to tweak your template to your liking. Again, you have to weight the time involved in learning PHP and CSS versus hiring. Up until now everything I’ve covered has been a minimal time investment. Comprehensive tweaking should be contracted. You’ll still be saving money in the long run, as the core functionality Wordpress brings, along with it’s stability and usability, is virtually free. Compare that with a web developer creating something from the ground up, and I think you’ll see the costs savings.
Wordpress is just one of the thousands of Open Source applications available to organizations and artists on the web. I choose to cover it over other simply because it has the capacity to serve as an organization’s visual communications “hub”, allowing for easy management and maintence, and can create a framework for company wide involvement. Other OSS programs that I would recommend investigating:

Audacity - sound editing and effects
Blender 3D - 3D modeling and animation
Filezilla- ftp client
Ganttproject - scheduling , resource management, calendaring
Gimp - image manipulation
OpenOffice.org - office suite
VLC Media Player - media player + VLC Portable
Sitesucker - web site copier

In short, my solution for smaller organizations is to embrace Open Source (and contract with a consultant for some limited help with design and strategy). You can cut out thousands of dollars that have historically been spent on programming, technical support, intense re-design, and maintenance. CFO’s and ED’s should rest assured that, through embracing Open Source they should be able to stay competitive with the latest communications tools with minimal investment and risk. Open Source is not without it’s problems, but as my father would say, “the price is right.”

Creative Commons and The Blogger

October 16, 2008

You just wrote the latest, greatest blog post. It is a tremendous read, almost guaranteed to get you recognized and your company new business. If only someone would read it. What you need is visuals to make it “pop” and to add that extra element to your narrative. You have a digital camera but you aren’t a photographer. Plus, you don’t have the time to go hunt from the perfect shot. If you’re like most of us, you search Google Images until you find an image that matches your theme, download it and promptly insert it into your blog. End of story, right? Wrong.

You just committed a crime. No, I don’t think the cops are going to break down your organizations door and confiscate your computers. In fact, most people won’t notice (or care). But being a socially conscious business person (you are, right?!) you need a solution that lets you use digital works legally and fairly. But without getting permission to use that picture you are violating the copyrights assigned to it’s author. A faceless crime, yes, but imagine if someone logged onto your website and used your brand-new communications handbook without your permission? A digital asset is a digital asset, no matter how you cut it.

Not having a licensing budget does not mean you have to cut out visuals from your blogs, articles and posts. It does mean that you will have to be smart about what you attach to your works and find the right tools that will enable fair use. Enter Creative Commons, a great asset for the writer, artist and organization.

by Anna Cotta.

by Anna Cotta.

Creative Commons “provides free tools that let authors, scientists, artists, and educators easily mark their creative work with the freedoms they want it to carry. You can use CC to change your copyright terms from “All Rights Reserved” to “Some Rights Reserved.” As you can see, this is one path that you can take to use images properly and responsibility. Creative Common lets the author of an image, for example, dictate how s/he wants the image to be used. There are several classifications available to the artist, the main being Attribution, Non-Commerical,No Derivative Works, and Share Alike. Within each of these classifications there are sub categories, to further refine the rights an author can attach to his or her works. An explanation of each:

Attribution. You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your copyrighted work — and derivative works based upon it — but only if they give credit the way you request. Example: Jane publishes her photograph with an Attribution license, because she wants the world to use her pictures provided they give her credit. Bob finds her photograph online and wants to display it on the front page of his website. Bob puts Jane’s picture on his site, and clearly indicates Jane’s authorship.

Noncommercial. You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your work — and derivative works based upon it — but for noncommercial purposes only. Examples: Gus publishes his photograph on his website with a Noncommercial license. Camille prints Gus’ photograph. Camille is not allowed to sell the print photograph without Gus’s permission.

No Derivative Works. You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work, not derivative works based upon it. Example: Sara licenses a recording of her song with a No Derivative Works license. Joe would like to cut Sara’s track and mix it with his own to produce an entirely new song. Joe cannot do this without Sara’s permission (unless his song amounts to fair use).

Share Alike. You allow others to distribute derivative works only under a license identical to the license that governs your work. Note: A license cannot feature both the Share Alike and No Derivative Works options. The Share Alike requirement applies only to derivative works.

Creative Commons has thought through the process of sharing and has accounted for the widest variety of usage. Depending on how you will be using those pictures for your blog, for example, will dictate which type of licenced media you should seek out. That leads to the next question: how do you find work with creative common licences attached to them?

The first place would be at Creative Common’s own website, where it lists a Content Directories which serves as a portal to sites across the web that attach Creative Commons licences to their work. Coming in a close second is the amazing integration Creative Commons shares with Flickr, the popular image hosting site. Flickr lets you search it exhaustive catalog of pictures and sort them by various creative common licences. In the Non-Attribution category, for example, Flickr has 10,097,703 images available for download and use.

by Armaggeusa. Used Under Creative Commons.

by Armaggeusa. Used Under Creative Commons.

While Creative Commons has certain flaws, and isn’t the end of the story with regards to copyright and author protection, I believe it is the first step to allowing the artists to connect with producers to create a strengthen what is already a symbiotic relationship. Writers and organizations need images/audio/video, and artists need venues to display their art.

What about quality? Like anything else, you’ll have to do a bit of searching. But as the picture attached to this blog attests, there are gems out there to be had, and it’s up to your resourcefulness to find them.

Other solutions include searching in the public domain, or direct artist contract, but I’ve found Creative Commons to be the best solution for our needs, and might be for yours as well. And won’t it be nice to publish that blog without the worry of a late night email threatening litagation from some far off artist for using his or her image without their permission? Not only does the law demand it, but some does your conscious.

Barack’s Digital Media Revealed

October 8, 2008

In three weeks the Presidential race will be over and the country will move on to other, more pressing issues. Before that happens, though, I wanted to comment on Barack Obama’s innovative use of new media and how it truly connected with young people throughout the country. From the brilliant design of barackobama.com to his use of text messaging, his campaign has made new media a focal part of their strategy and it’s paid off in spades.

The first thing I noticed about Barack’s campaign was the evolution of his website, with it’s current incarnation being the best of the three. Todd Ziegler of the Bivings Report blog has a really good post about the evolution of his website design. Looking at the screen shots that Mr. Ziegler cataloged, it’s obvious that Obama’s team has worked tirelessly to keep the site moving forward. By taking “away” more information and streamlining the presentation of information has made it a much more effective user experience.

Although most designers I know to do not endorse using a splash page, I think Obama’s is the rare case where it is effective. Why? It serves a purpose. Rather than making us wait for some over-produced animation to play out, we are greeted with it’s purpose right away: to donate. The entry boxes are big and wide and the “Skip Signup” is easy to access. It works because of its simplicity. We get it, and whether we donate or not, the process of continuing on is short and straight forward.

The web site design is an elegant combination of functionality and design. The color palette is consistent and evenly distributed. Each section is clearly boxed and sepereted, a must when trying to present a bevy of information to the end user. They embraced the blog format, which was smart considering the demographics of their core supporters. While designers used to be terrified to make someone scroll (god forbid) blog have pretty much eliminated that worry if the site is done right.

Another thing I noticed about Barack’s strategy was the constant use of, and referral to, new technologies. Case in point: Here is Barack’s campaign manger, David Plouffe, making a video for his constituents on his laptop.

YouTube Preview Image

This is the first time I can remember official media coming from a Presidential campaign in something other than slick, professionally produced commercials. Going high tech for a “lo tech” product is a great strategy. First, he connects with younger people who are familiar with the technology and appreciate the campaigns use of it. Second, the personal, video diary quality of Mr. Plouffe’s clips have a personal, real feel to them. A great supplement to the slick campaign ads that we see on the networks. Going further, they even branded their YouTube page to mirror that of the campaign so it seems like a seamless extention of the main site.

Not only does Mr. Plouffe get the “lo tech” treatment, but many videos on Barack’s site carry the “documentary” YouTube feel. Here is one such video featuring Rep. Keith Ellison speaking to a group of Arab Americans. Notice the sound echo and flat lighting. While it doesn’t do much for the art of video making, it comes off as real, authentic and immediate.

These are a few of my thoughts as this campaign season winds down. I’ll be posting more thoughts as we wind our way to November 4th.

Keep fighting,
Pablo

Latest From Camino PR

October 3, 2008

Camino PR

Camino PR

Camino helps spark positive social change through media advocacy, publicity, communications strategies, marketing campaigns, social marketing initiatives, promotion, and crisis communication. Camino helps organizations reach diverse audiences and utilize multimedia strategies.

Below you will find the latest entries of Elizabeth Toledo’s acclaimed blog, ET’s Daily Digest, which is a combination of personal observation and social critique.

[Read more]

Back To The Future: Good Fight Goes HD

October 3, 2008

In 1997, as a recent graduate of USC’s Film School, I remember telling a woman on a plane that I doubt I’d ever become a filmmaker if I always had to “shoot on film.” She thought that was quite odd. “Are you going to shoot video? Like on the news?” she asked, with a disapproving frown. A nervous laugh escaped as I tried to reassure not only her but myself that I could indeed become a “filmmaker” without actually shooting video. [Read more]

Project Libertad

October 3, 2008

Building on the success of our first feature film, Runnin’ At Midnite, we are excited to announce Project Libertad, a unique initiative whose mission is to create art free of the confines of the established system, and to give a voice to those who have traditionally been denied access to film, photography and design.

Our unique model provides educational opportunities to youth through free filmmaking workshops held before & during each project. Our goal is to inspire members of a community to take part in the creative process while encouraging youth to learn alongside professionals.

The cornerstone of the project is the feature film Libertad, a hard hitting drama that explores the shanty towns populating the border of Mexico and the United States.

Help us as we set out to redefine the nature of storytelling, where studios and box-office names no longer dictate which voices get heard. Filmmaking has the power to educate minds, stimulate thought, and galvanize cultures. In other words, it liberates.

Visit Project Libertad by clicking here, or entering the URL: http://projectlibertad.org.

Contact us and learn how you can become part of the movement.

The Original Good Fighter

October 2, 2008

My grandfather was a pretty dynamic man. Deeply flawed, complicated, tough, brazen, and stubborn. A bit like life, I suppose. I was only 9 when he passed away. While I knew him really well, I can remember feeling a deep sadness that I would not get to know him during my adult life. My young mind knew some of the contradictions that defined him were too complex for me to fully grasp, reconcile and understand. So I have come to know “the man” that is my Tata through stories, yarns, and fables. [Read more]